Any person who does not believe Simpson murdered Ron and Nicole is an absolute moron and not worth any of your time and energy.

The indisputable fact is that Clark and Darden were inept as prosecutors in the courtroom and, as we later learned of their sordid sex affair during the trial, were probably just as bad in their bedroom.

Vince Bugliosi eloquently wrote of Clark and Darden's failures. Those two, with the help of Mark Furman, bear all the responsibility for allowing that murderer Simpson to go free. It was their failure to present all the evidence, their failure to rehabilitate the testimony of that stupid racist Furman, and their ridiculous and unconvincing summations that allowed the jury to let that pig and coward Simpson go free.

Fred Goldman - keep on pressuring Simpson and making his life as miserable as possible. Keep Simpson in court and keep going after any and all of his wealth. Don't quit. Stay strong.

It is too bad there is no way to charge Clark and Darden for prosecutorial misconduct, of which they are most certainly guilty.

WE ARE THE ONLY TWO RACE THAT ACT TOTALLY STUPID. BLACKS AND WHITES. CAN SOMEONE POSTING ON THIS SITE TELL ME WHEN WILL OR IF EVER THIS WOULD END? ALL THIS RACISM ON THIS SITE IS UNCONSCIOUSABLE. OTHER RACES DO NOT ACT THIS WAY ESPECIALLY NOT THIS OFTEN. WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT US GOOD AMERICANS? SAD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

11:52 so should we throw out the entire justice system? It's moot whether the collective opinion is that he was guilty. He was found not guilty in a court of law. End of story. Saying, so what, "we" think he's guilty and should face a lifetime of legal harassment because of it means that the justice system is not worth much, doesn't it? If anything should be looked at anally, it's the justice system. It means that you can be accused of a crime, found not guilty, but face legal repercussions all your life because of the personal opinion of people. It's often said that a country is only as good as it's justice system. If we're throwing ours out the window what does that say? THAT is the big picture. OJ is NOT the big picture. One man versus an entire justice system is the big picture? I don't think so. And again, I'm not arguing whether he was guilty or not. By law he IS not. Now was, not wrongly, he IS not guilty.

He moved his own mouth and said "no one leaves" and went into a room. According to people he 1. Was invited in to the room as a result of Riccio and 2. Did not use a gun. The police must prove the knew of the guns, his intent, and his actions. Even legal experts who openly despise him are saying the case is shaky. His bail was set at $125,000 for TEN FELONIES. That alone tells you about the stability of the charges.

To compare Riccio to an undercover sting is laughable. A felon convicted of dealing in stolen merchandise happens to set up a sting involving stolen merchandise, records the sting, sells the recording before he gives it to police comparable to an undercover operation? What an insult to police. Police are help to a very high standard in regards to evidence, which the tape would be, and procedures. I love how OJ was called a vigilante in the beginning days of this but Riccio as compared to a police operation, essentially taking the sting, a police action, into his own hands.

The scene in the book about the murder was not all that graphic, in fact he did not describe it much. It started with movie-like fights and then had a black out. It could have been written by anyone. Poor taste doesn't begin to describe it, but not really a great source for guilt.

I think people are confusing being "set up" with being "framed". To set up is simply getting ready to tape or somehow record someone who you know is about to commit a criminal act. To frame, however, is to make it look like an innocent person did something that they did not do. OJ may have been set up, but he was not framed, as you can cleary hear him on a tape threatening people. Someone just set up to record him doing something bad, finally. There is nothing wrong w/ that, it's great! For all the people saying he's innocent, um, a tape recording is about as obvious as it can be. You're weirdo's.

I am racist against n!gers. I have intelligent b!ack friends tho who don't act stupid. All you fu*kin dumb n!ggers in here that get all offended how come you talk sh!t about whites but if we do it you freak the eff out?

Oj needs a bullet in the head. I am also really tired of all the b1ack people coming to his defense. It's like you defend him cuz he's one of your kind. It's BS. B1acks are just as racist if not more. When are you going to hold people accountable for their actions. You could care less that 2 white people were stabbed to death. You all know OJ is guilty but you wont admit it. You always gotta play the race card never fails.

p.s I like b1ack people but I hate n1ggers

As long as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are around, blacks will have a voice and whites will suffer for it. Also, no black that's famous or has some money will go undefended by them. They go for the $$$ Rainbow push coalition, fvck heads. Amen brothers, non religious boingo heads.

558 anon- so, I'm a racist because I don't believe that blacks should have special priveleges? If you're white and you believe that you're unintelligent, and if you're black and you believe that you're lazy. You sound like you're 10 yrs old, calling people names. Oh, and you're a pig too! (I'm saying this in a baby voice.)

Maggie the man wrote a book on how he would have murdered Nicole (if he did it.) He claimed he was innocent for the last decade and now he writes a book on how he would have murdered Nicole (with very graphic details.) I am sure he will claim that he is innocent on this and a decade later write a book about this too.

Tyra how can you blame Nicole? Ten years later he is facing charges again that could put him in prison for life. I don't know what the color of someone's skin has anything to do with this.

If OJ would have only dated pretty black chicks he'd never have had any of the problems he's had in his life. He should stay away from white trash.

3:56 PM AJ Says:

"Why did he have a blood soaked sock in the Bronco?"

Just going on that.

239 anon who wrote in all caps- 1 totally 100% agree with you. I never give blacks special treatment. Hear that blacks? I don't owe you anything! Kiss my white ass.

The sock was not found in the Bronco. The sock was "found" in the house. The sock appeared to have blood placed on it when there was no foot in it, which coupled with the missing blood raises a lot of doubt. There was also a preservative found in the blood on the sock that is used in labs. It can be found in fresh blood but was not found in all samples.