This all about money....he is not tellign the truth...he was paid to say those things....
Tuesday September 25, 2007

NBC Photo/Heidi Gutman
On September 17, Tony Barretto revealed himself as the "mystery witness" in the Federline v. Spears custody case. Citing instances of drug use and drinking, he told the Today show on Monday that his decision to come forward was based on his concern for Spears' sons, Sean Preston (2) and Jayden James (1), who he thinks are in danger under their mother's care.
We asked you if you believe Barretto, and despite last week's judge's order describing Spears as a "habitual and frequent" user of controlled substances, over half of you said you still stand by the pop-mom.
When asked, do you believe Barretto's claims, you answered:
Yes: 44.11%
No: 55.89%
Categories: Britney Spears | Custody Battle
i'm sure he has some intresting stories to tell but if he's not carefull he will kill his credibility he should not come off as an attention grabbing gold digger if he really cares about the boys he needs to just testify.
I wouldn't believe him for da world!!! I think he is staight up lying. I wish they would just leave her alone!!!
POB you forgot to say where that article was at x-17 online you are slipping watch out!
She BRITNEY has NO respect for the law pending a jail sentence she was driving again last night with yet another fender bender she has no liscense she knows EVERYONE will see this what an idiot!
Why would any one here believe the poll results anyways really? When you can't even post a comment without a bunch of drama...yeah it's not hard to see where poll results would be fixed. This is a waste of space.
Who cares if we think he is lying? That is for the judge to decide. It takes a lot to take a child away from a mother. We only see pictures and a writers take on a person from someone wanting to make money off the celebrity that jilted them. She is crazy but we never hear about K-Fed, because he was and is still a nobody.
I'm sorry but this is an important thing you need to know!!! This poll's results have been faked!!!!
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
I'm sorry but this is an important thing you need to know!!! This poll's results have been faked!!!!
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
I'm sorry but this is an important thing you need to know!!! This poll's results have been faked!!!!
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
I'm sorry but this is an important thing you need to know!!! This poll's results have been faked!!!!
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
I'm sorry but this is important for you to know:
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
sorry but...
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p : / /" at the beginning, and remove the spaces to get the link:)
foro.univision . c o m/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist).
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
US-Magazine:
Some Britney's fans (not many, around half of a dozen) have been sending fake votes to make the "NO" option to increase to that NOT-REAL level.
Here you have the link to the Britney's fan forum (where they are saying "hey, we have a new poll there let's attack it and vote again and again to increase the "NO"):
(add "h t t p" at the beginning to get the link:)
foro.univision.com/univision/board/message?board.id=britneyspears&message.id=236357
This hasen't been the result of your readers opinion, but that of a "fans attack".
If you simply examine the IP of the votes or the visits to your webpage, you'll realize the reality: you have had only a few persons voting for the "NO" option, but voting again and again for it (as fans are used to do in a daily basis to vote for their artirt to move up positions in the charts. They can be for hours voting again and again just to change the poll result in the favor of their artist.
Just realise and remove the wrong article... This poll doesn´t show your readers opinion at all...
Either the intelligent people who visit the Us site were just busy doing...i dunno, working? while the idiots were wasting away in front of the computer, OR the britney brigade just came on the polls and voted over and over again (can they do that?)
either way, the general population would NOT take britney's word over this guy at this point, please can we have an accurate representation of public opinion and not just a cheap ploy of a story to get more readers on your site?
I think he's telling the truth, everyone knows she's doing drugs even the judge. So what if he looks like an ape and is making money off her. She fired him for not getting her hat, f that, I'd tell on her too!
great song... i love you just the way you are...aahhharrrr
Where did everyone go?
Man all you left at the same time hmmm kinda makes you wonder?
3:46 PM JustMe Says:
I agree with 3:00Anonymous. Britney's supposed "loyal fans" just can't seem to accept that this girl's got issues. It's one thing to root for her and hopes she turns herself around, it's another thing to just assume everything everyone including what her own family and friends are saying about her are lies, all because you're still fixated on her music and what she was years ago. Everyone (well not really everyone) is rooting for her big comeback. That's crazy cuz this girl needs to be focused on her kids right now, they are still so little and I'm sure they're not smothered with her attention enough as it is. My boys are slightly older than hers and even they require all my attention....course they're napping right now though. Either way wasn't she once trying to give advice on how to be a good mother (how silly she sounded) by saying to be a really good mother your kids require all your attention. She's friggin' loony and needs to be a mother first, trainwreck\performer last.
Thank you! This is 3:00 anon, and I just wanted to add that I would love to see her straighten her life out and make a great comeback! I think she could balance motherhood and music but just has to straighten certain things out, first.
Got it I am not a big Billy Joel fan love St. Elmos fire however.
POB, actually, I was dedicating the Billy Joel lyrics to you. From his song Just The Way You Are.
Billy Joel - Just The Way You Are Lyrics
Don't go changing, to try and please me
You never let me down before
Don't imagine you're too familiar
And I don't see you anymore
I wouldn't leave you in times of trouble
We never could have come this far
I took the good times, I'll take the bad times
I'll take you just the way you are
Don't go trying some new fashion
Don't change the color of your hair
You always have my unspoken passion
Although I might not seem to care
I don't want clever conversation
I never want to work that hard
I just want someone that I can talk to
I want you just the way you are.
I need to know that you will always be
The same old someone that I knew
What will it take till you believe in me
The way that I believe in you.
I said I love you and that's forever
And this I promise from the heart
I could not love you any better
I love you just the way you are.
I'm pretty sure that is a Billy Joel song, but whatever floats your boat.
Plain old bas tard.
Anon 3:44 that comes from a line in St. Elmos fire Rob Lowe to that other chick he said dont gochangin tryin to please me.
the people who don't believe that britney's on drugs are DUMB DUMB DUMB!!!
OK gotta love all the pob's out there...WOW!


