She looks a little old. I saw many pretty and charming women on pluscupid.com. If you take a search, you may get a big surprise.

ANGELINA JOLIE IS A FRAUD - PURE FRAUD.

WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM A PROFESSIONAL ACTRESS?

Ron Redmund, Chief Spokesman, Office of the UN High Commissioner for RefugeesUNHCR) Geneva
About Jolie:
“The opinion that really counts is that of the world’s refugees, millions of whom have benefitted directly from the work of angelina jolie…..they love her….”

“BEFORE YOU CRITIZE SOMEONE, YOU SHOULD WALK A MILE IN THEIR SHOES. THAT WAY WHEN YOU CAN CRITICIZE THEM, YOU ARE A MILE AWAY FROM THEM AND YOU HAVE THEIR SHOES.”

"BITING, DESTRUCTIVE CRITICISM IS BAD AND EVIL. ONE CAN BE CRITICAL WITHOUT RESORTING TO INSULTS, BUT TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT."

THE ABOVE REQUIRES SKILLFUL WAYS OF THINKING.

“BEFORE YOU CRITIZE SOMEONE, YOU SHOULD WALK A MILE IN THEIR SHOES. THAT WAY WHEN YOU CAN CRITICIZE THEM, YOU ARE A MILE AWAY FROM THEM AND YOU HAVE THEIR SHOES.”

ANGELINA JOLIE IS A FRAUD - PURE FRAUD.

WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM A PROFESSIONAL ACTRESS?

10AM Time to take your meds. Looks like you missed on a couple there.You're in Lalaland.

Thank you so much!!! I couldn't have said it better myself. Beautiful and ambitious, yes; smart and an independent, critical thinker - absolutely NOT.

5:34 AM Anonymous Says:

I have read some excerpts from Angelina's travel notes and I have also read her Washington Post editorial. She clearly had professional assistance in both, but especially in her editorial--not that it was a meaningful piece; it was useless fluff--just that its format and some content were clearly the result of assistance. Her travel notes are vacuous. Complete campy drivel. She can read and recite lines written by other people well, but it is clear that she is simply an average intellect with a lot of ambition. She just cannot form a meaningful, insightful, coherent sentence on her own.

Eventually, it will catch up with her. Right now, she is surviving off a massive pump job in the media, but she says too many inane, ridiculous, contradictory, or patently false things, and such incidents (along with her personal history and actions) accumulate in the mind of the public. That is why she feels the need to control the media. If she were confident of the quality of her intellectual endeavors, she would not need to attempt to control the media so tightly and lobby so hard to gain exposure among prominent names. She is trying to re-write reality, and that is a losing game.

People should just stop comparing Angelina to Jennifer, clearly, Jennifer is just way way below Angelina in terms of beauty, intelligence, talent and accomplishments, personal and otherwise.

Angelina is an oscar winning actress, who works with the likes of Eastwood, Hopkins, De Niro, oliver Stone, etc.

Jennifer is merely a comedian works with the likes of Steve Zahn, Eckart, Stiller, Carrey, all comedic people.

Angelina is very eloquent in her interviews, both on TV's and magazines, and has even written an op-ed with WP and now the Economist. Jennifer is very inarticulate in her TV interviews and is a dumbo even in her magazine interviews, check out her latest Harper's.

Angelina is well regarded in the worldwide humanitarian community, she is a UN Goodwill Ambassador, she has won various awards as proof, Global Humanitarian of the Year, World Citizen of the Year, Freedom Award, etc. She talks and walks with the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Condee Rice, the Davos crowd, British PM Gordon Brown, Richard Branson, Bill and melinda Gates, etc, etc.

While Aniston is the poster girl for best in hairstyle and hobnobs with Courtney and DAvid arquette, sheryl crowe, and some other D listers.

On a personal side, Angelina is happily together with Brad Pitt and their 4 kids and still growing. Jennifer is still alone with no kids.

Lastly, beautywise, clearly, we know who the winner is. AS they always say, Angelina is HW siren, vixen, goddess, sexiest woman alive. while Aniston is always described as merely the Girl next door, america's sweetheart type.

Advice to Angelina: STOP TRYING TOO HARD!!

I have read articles written by this woman and they can only sound articulate to a person from a country ruled by George Bush. You probably think even Bush's speaches are articulater. There is nothing in her article even this one that has not been said and is her original idea. I wonder how much the economist was paid to publish it and taint their reputation like this. Her ideas of accoutnability are so shallow and she shows a total lack of understanding of the history of the problem she is alluding to. She for instance fails to mention who started that rebellion and how they should be held accountable as well. Her presence on the international political scene makes a mockery of world issues which are sensitive and need to be handled by more serious characters than has been h00kers.

4:40 Says:

Yes, Angelina is so classy that after stating how shy and embarrassed she was to make revealing pictures for the movie, she wears tight leather pants to a formal occasion, and then the pants split to show her underwear. She does indeed belong among the ranks of ambitious, vulgar trash like Clinton and the U.N. because the truly upper brow of society do not associate with her.

FYI, she only seems articulate to you because you are stupid.

People should just stop comparing Angelina to Jennifer, clearly, Jennifer is just way way below Angelina in terms of beauty, intelligence, talent and accomplishments, personal and otherwise.

Angelina is an oscar winning actress, who works with the likes of Eastwood, Hopkins, De Niro, oliver Stone, etc.

Jennifer is merely a comedian works with the likes of Steve Zahn, Eckart, Stiller, Carrey, all comedic people.

Angelina is very eloquent in her interviews, both on TV's and magazines, and has even written an op-ed with WP and now the Economist. Jennifer is very inarticulate in her TV interviews and is a dumbo even in her magazine interviews, check out her latest Harper's.

Angelina is well regarded in the worldwide humanitarian community, she is a UN Goodwill Ambassador, she has won various awards as proof, Global Humanitarian of the Year, World Citizen of the Year, Freedom Award, etc. She talks and walks with the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Condee Rice, the Davos crowd, British PM Gordon Brown, Richard Branson, Bill and melinda Gates, etc, etc.

While Aniston is the poster girl for best in hairstyle and hobnobs with Courtney and DAvid arquette, sheryl crowe, and some other D listers.

On a personal side, Angelina is happily together with Brad Pitt and their 4 kids and still growing. Jennifer is still alone with no kids.

Lastly, beautywise, clearly, we know who the winner is. AS they always say, Angelina is HW siren, vixen, goddess, sexiest woman alive. while Aniston is always described as merely the Girl next door, america's sweetheart type.

GOD BLESS HER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The title should have been, "Angelina Jolie's mediocre writing, which was enhanced by consultants, is re-worked by editors for the Economist."

There are a lot of people who are a lot more qualified to write about Darfur than Angelina Jolie. That trashy woman will stop at nothing to appear respectable.